Interesting Post on Reversing the Model of How Students Learn the Research Process

Kelly Dagan has an extremely thought-provoking post over on her blog on flipping our standard models of how we teach students to do research.

So, drawing on a suggestion from one of her faculty, instead of a process of research where students

(1) (a) develop a research question (b) search for information on that question (c) evaluate sources and (d) synthesize those sources into an original research product, we would have students, instead,

(2) (a) Learn to read one scholarly piece and understand that piece really well  and then (b) later do all the other hard stuff, like searching, synthesizing, and so forth, once they’ve become more sophisticated in college.

I’m, of course, a (1) man from way back, and my knee-jerk response is not to throw the baby out with the bathwater,  but I think this post brings up some really interesting issues, especially since, as we all know, (1) ain’t very easy for expert researchers, much less incoming freshmen. Maybe something like (2) would be a useful approach for working with new students if we brainstormed on it bit more, or incorporated it more into (1).

Check out Kelly’s post where she explains this all much better and has good diagrams as well!

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Bibliographic Instruction is Dead, Education, Library Instruction, Posts by Kevin Michael Klipfel, The Library Game

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s